HOMOSEXUALITY
This page deals with
the matter of Homosexuality from the Biblical perspective. The
main concern here is with what the Bible SAYS. Homosexuality
may be defined as the sexual attraction (whether overt or not) of two
of more people for the same sex. Generally, the term is used
of male with male; the term lesbian is used for sexual attraction
of one or more females for another female. However, the term
homosexual will be used to refer to both. Any other term is
not valid except the term sodomy based on the Biblical town, Sodom.
1. The Old Testament. The Old Testament has a few references
to homosexuality. There is no doubt that these speak very clearly about
it.
2. The New Testament. In the New Testament there is only one
passage that deals with this subject directly.
In conclusion, It must be made clear that God does not
hate the homosexual; He does hate their sin. Furthermore, it must be
made clear that this sin is no greater than adultery, etc. Also, being
referred here is to the actual physical act, not any emotional or psychological
tendency. Being tempted is not sin; but doing is. The
solution lies in turning from the sin to the Lord Jesus Christ Who is able
to save to the uttermost. Then you can hear the Savior say as He did
to the woman taken in adultery, "Neither do I condemn thee; go and sin no
more." (John 8:11). Jesus did not condone her sin, but forgave her
and told to sin no more. To the homosexual, the words of Christ comes;
He will forgive you, and then tell you to sin no more. For more help,
go to the web page, How to Be
Saved.
a. Genesis 19. This chapter deals with the
situation in Sodom. The main verse is verse 5, "And they [men
of the city, young and old] called unto Lot, and said unto him, 'Where
are the men which came in to thee this night? Bring them out unto us,
that we may know them." (Bold type for emphasis). That this
word "know" refers to sexual activity as often used that way. That
this is the case here is evident from verses 7 and 8. Sodom (and Gomorrah
for that matter) were not judged for lack of hospitality as suggested
by some. Clearly, the judgment against Sodom and surrounding cities
were due to the sin of homosexuality. Any other construction
on this event is a travesty and an attempt to avoid the plain evidence set
herein.
b. Leviticus 18:22. In Leviticus 18:22,
it is stated, "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is
abomination." This entire chapter is dealing with wrong sexual practices.
The context clearly indicates this fact. The next verse deals
with sex with an animal; the preceding to giving one's seed in idolatrous
practices. To confine verse 22 to the idolatrous practice is
a travesty of this verse, and one would be forced (logically) to confine
verse 23 as well as verse 20 to it also. Obviously, this is not possible;
therefore, verse 22 must teach just what it says, namely, homosexuality is
a sin as much as any of the other wrong sexual practices in this
chapter.
c. Leviticus 20:13. Likewise, Leviticus
20:13 clearly sets forth this sin: "If a man also lie with mankind,
as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination."
Again, the context shows that sexual sins are in view. Any other
explanation that this verse teaches something other than homosexuality
is a sin is a travesty and an attempt to avoid the plain meaning of this
verse.
d. 1 Samuel 18. One other passage
must be considered because it is used
to try to show the rightness of
homosexuality. This passage deals with the bond of friendship between
David and Jonathan. Twice it says that Jonathan "loved him [David]
as his own soul." First of all, love does not require
sexual activity. sEcond, the common used term in the Old Testament
for sexual contact, namely, know is not used at all. There
is absolutely nothing in this passage which implies any sexual relationship
between Jonathan and David. Any attempt to construe this is a desperate
try to make a case where there is none.
a. Ephesians 4:19 has implications of
this sin, but no direct statement.
b. The main passage is Romans 1:26,
27--"For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections;
for even their women did change the natural use into that which
is against nature; and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of
the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working
that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of
their error which is meet."
Some have tried to argue that this passage
refers to idolaters. Though idolaters may practice this, these verses
are more general. Furthermore, it would be necessary to confine verses
28-32 to idolaters which is patently false. Idolatry is in the context,
but that does not mean that any of these practices are confined to it.
These verses are very, very clear that
it is sin for men to have sex with men and women with women. To put
any other construction on these verses is a travesty of the plain meaning
of the words.
c. It is quite possible that 1 Corinthians 6:9 has
a reference to homosexuality in the phrase "abusers of themselves with
mankind." The Greek word refers to homosexuality (or sodomy).
Even the word "effeminate" has the meaning in the Greek of an unnatural lust.
The context is the word "adulterers."
If you came from the
Interpretation web page, click on it; otherwise
click below.